Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Give your thoughts and ideas.

Moderator: Moderator

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby darkwaffle » Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:43 am

Well they want them so that they've got more casts available on their quickslots, which is clunky and annoying, but still an effective artificial bottleneck to how much rods can be used.
goddamn 1s
User avatar
darkwaffle
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:52 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby NintendoJesus » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:44 am

Well, I suppose if your argument against Greater Rods is that sloppy tanks who don't want to organize their inventory will benefit from it, I don't have much argument, I suppose they would. l0l
NintendoJesus
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:01 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby darkwaffle » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:23 am

My argument is that I don't think "Greater Rods" are without balancing implications, even though everyone likes the idea because it's convenient and nice and as such are quick to say yes. You effectively triple/quadruple the number of "spell slots" given to every character except the ones who actually give a crap about whether or not you have the buffs.

I'm not even affected by DW or Freedom [usually] (though giving everyone 3x-4x more clarity would likely be problematic), but I speak from experience of having to deal with Greater Rods of PFA/UV/NEP/Restoration for many years already.
goddamn 1s
User avatar
darkwaffle
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:52 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby Restos » Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:13 pm

Don't get me wrong, but is your argument based on whether or not tanks will have more or less room on their quickslots? Last I checked, tanks are swimming in quickslots. Even bards.
And as a mage, it hurts you to free up space off some quickslots?
User avatar
Restos
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:57 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby awet » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:50 pm

Topic strarted with an intersting quest and then go out of the way...

add or not GREATER ROD OF xxxxxxxxxx ?

i vote for YES

The reasons to have g rods of lesser and noraml restore, nep, see inv, ultravision are valid also for others kind of rods ....
awet
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:03 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby sonicle » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:28 pm

For it !
sonicle
General of War
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby nukularpower » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:59 pm

Against x100
nukularpower
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:21 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby fuzzylilkitten » Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:02 pm

See invis/UV/NEP make sense to have greater rods for because the duration is like 2 mins and you have to rebuff them so often. DW and FoM have fairly long durations, I don't really see the need for it.

I'm still against but w/e.
User avatar
fuzzylilkitten
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:51 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby NintendoJesus » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:13 am

I have nothing further to add.
NintendoJesus
Keeper of War
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:01 pm

Re: Greater Rod of XXXXXX

Postby Danko » Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:49 am

fuzzylilkitten wrote:See invis/UV/NEP make sense to have greater rods for because the duration is like 2 mins and you have to rebuff them so often. DW and FoM have fairly long durations, I don't really see the need for it.

I'm still against but w/e.


Greater Rod of Clarity please :)
User avatar
Danko
Bantit Chief
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Suggestion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron